The rally we love to hate.

Market rallies can be the stuff that try investors’ souls. On the surface, rallies are good news, but look deeper and you’ll find investors filled with uncertainty over how long the rally will last or whether the bottom might fall out altogether. The uncertainty then leaves investors forced to hesitatingly dip their toes into the market waters (or wade deeper) as prices grind higher. The current rally—which began in the middle of February when the S&P 500 started its nearly 20% ascent—is both heated and hated. It has simultaneously taken us to all-time price heights and amplified the usual rally trepidation.

Why is the current rally so reviled?

On many recent occasions, we have noted our concerns over an earnings recession. Results for the second quarter appear to be headed for another year-over-year decline this time in the neighborhood of 3%, with positive comparisons not expected until the fourth quarter of this year. Looking at the next 12 months, however, earnings optimism abounds. The S&P 500 is trading at 17.1 times the forward 12 months earnings (P/E ratio), which is well above the recent average and toward the high end of the range (Figure 1). Earnings are expected to grow 13.6% in 2017 which appears to be very (perhaps overly) robust considering the difficulty we have had in developing any sort of growth in the past few years. Given this, there seems to be a lot of hope surrounding the most fundamental factor: corporate earnings. While we sometimes question if it is enough to power a major earnings expansion, the underlying growth in the U.S. economy provides a backdrop to our core narrative which supports further growth particularly around consumer spending—the highlight of the recently released 2Q GDP data. The paltry 1.2% gain in overall GDP is not as bad as it may initially appear given the strength of consumer spending, but the lack of growth in business spending remains puzzling and is something we will continue to watch carefully.

Figure 1
S&P 500 expectations echo earnings optimism

Contrary to our concerns from a fundamentals perspective, technical factors are firmly supporting the market—in particular, the highly accommodative stance being taken by central banks. Our Federal Reserve just decided to once again leave rates steady while opening the door a crack on a September hike. More than likely they will leave this decision until December, echoing the end of last year. With two rate hikes likely spanning a year’s timeframe, the Fed is clearly reinforcing the view of many that it will remain “lower for longer.” Accommodation extends well beyond U.S. markets, where central bank balance sheets continue to grow (Figure 2). These purchases, combined with over $12 trillion in sovereign debt yielding less than 0%, have created incentives for global investors to pour money into our markets in the search for any sort of positive yield. This has helped to lower Treasury yields, narrow corporate bond spreads, and raise prices on dividend-paying stocks. Both the Bank of Japan and the European Central Bank will contribute to further balance sheet additions, thus expanding their accommodative positioning.

Figure 2
Combined balance sheets of the Fed, European Central Bank, Bank of Japan, and Bank of England

We find ourselves stuck between fundamental factors that have yet to prove themselves and technical factors in which central banks appear to be intent on keeping asset prices highly valued. Some might say that this has the making of a “bubble” and they would probably be right if earnings fail to materialize and the central banks start tightening. However, the earnings story has months to play out and central bank accommodative policies are not likely to go away anytime soon. Look for the rally—and our love-hate relationship with it—to last a while longer.

Positioning shift for emerging markets

One arena where we think fundamental factors are in play and turning favorable is in emerging markets (EM). We have maintained an underweight position in this space since September 2013 but our Investment Committee (IC) voted this month to start moving portfolios closer to a neutral weight relative to our long-term strategic asset allocations.

The IC has been monitoring EM improvement and focusing on several potential tipping points we’d need to see before considering any trades. These included a Fed that’s unlikely to raise rates aggressively and indications that Chinese growth was stabilizing. As mentioned above, indications are the Fed will remain “lower for longer” and even if it raised rates in September or December, there is little reason to expect it would be the first in a series of further hikes. While concerns about China (the largest EM by equity market capitalization), are still likely to flare up occasionally, the government appears to successfully be managing any issues and limiting downside risk.

In addition to the just-mentioned triggers, we considered a number of other supportive factors. Outside of China, there appears to be building a fairly broad base in support of EM growth. Also, the largest companies in the EM indices are shifting toward “new” economy-based firms. As we noted in our Capital Markets Forecast commentary, “The wheat from the chaff: obstacles and opportunities,” emerging countries were likely to transition from basic and commodity-centric firms toward those engaged in retail services and technology. We are seeing growing evidence that this is taking place. Looking closely at Asian technology stocks, broader EM telecom stocks, energy stocks, and Brazilian financials, they are making significant return contributions. We believe these particular equity drivers are not transitory and that they will persist and grow.

Large-cap sector adjustments

Finally, we have made some small adjustments to our Wilmington Trust Sector Allocation Strategy®, removing underweights to the consumer discretionary, energy, and telecom sectors. We have also adjusted weights in healthcare and industrials to account for the movement of Danaher (designer and manufacturer of medical, industrial, and commercial products) from industrials to healthcare. We are taking up a slight overweight to energy, based on the improving supply and demand balance into 2017 as the U.S. rig count declines. Improvements in valuation metrics supported additional weights to telecom and consumer discretionary.

Have comments or questions? Please share them with your Investment Advisor.

Market statistics
As of August 1, 2016


Wilmington Trust is a registered service mark. Wilmington Trust Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of M&T Bank Corporation. Investment management and fiduciary services are provided by Wilmington Trust Company, operating in Delaware only, and Wilmington Trust, N.A., a national bank. Loans, retail and business deposits, and other personal and business banking services and products are offered by Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (M&T Bank), member FDIC. Wilmington Trust Investment Advisors, Inc., a subsidiary of M&T Bank, is a SEC-registered investment adviser providing investment management services to Wilmington Trust and M&T affiliates and clients.

These materials are based on public information. Facts and views presented in this report have not been reviewed by, and may not reflect information known to, professionals in other business areas of Wilmington Trust or M&T Bank who may provide or seek to provide financial services to entities referred to in this report. M&T Bank and Wilmington Trust have established information barriers between their various business groups. As a result, M&T Bank and Wilmington Trust do not disclose certain client relationships with, or compensation received from, such entities in their reports. 

The information in Capital Notes has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. The opinions, estimates, and projections constitute the judgment of Wilmington Trust and are subject to change without notice. This commentary is for information purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the sale of any financial product or service or a recommendation or determination that any investment strategy is suitable for a specific investor. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the suitability of any investment strategy based on the investor’s objectives, financial situation, and particular needs. Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against a loss. There is no assurance that any investment strategy will succeed. 

Any investment products discussed in this commentary are not insured by the FDIC or any other governmental agency, are not deposits of or other obligations of or guaranteed by M&T Bank, Wilmington Trust, or any other bank or entity, and are subject to risks, including a possible loss of the principal amount invested. Some investment products may be available only to certain “qualified investors”—that is, investors who meet certain income and/or investable assets thresholds. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or a loss. 

Any positioning information provided does not include all positions that were taken in client accounts and may not be representative of current positioning. It should not be assumed that the positions described are or will be profitable or that positions taken in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of those described. Positions described are illustrative and not intended as a recommendation outside of a managed account. 

Indices are not available for direct investment. Investment in a security or strategy designed to replicate the performance of an index will incur expenses, such as management fees and transaction costs that would reduce returns. 

Third party trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. 


Barclays Aggregate Bond Index
Formerly the Lehman Aggregate Bond Index, this index tracks investment-grade bonds traded in the U.S.; the securities are weighted according to their market size.

Citigroup Economic Surprise Index
A measure for various regions, which shows how economic data are progressing relative to consensus forecasts of market economists. The weighted, historical standard deviations of data surprises are calculated daily in a rolling three-month window. A positive reading suggests economic releases have on balance been beating consensus estimates.

Dow Jones Industrial Average
Index that shows how 30 large, publicly owned U.S. companies have traded during a standard trading session in the stock market.

HFRX Global Hedge Fund Index
One of the family of 75 HFRX Hedge Fund Indexes, the global industry standard for performance measurement across all aspects of the hedge fund industry.

Largely recognized as the preeminent benchmark in the U.S. to measure international stock performance; it comprises indexes that represent developed markets outside of North America: Europe, Australasia, and the Far East.

MSCI Emerging Markets Index
Designed to measure stock market performance in the global emerging markets; it covers over 800 securities across 23 markets and represents roughly 13% of world market capitalization.

NASDAQ Composite Index
Index of common stocks and similar securities listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market Index, which has over 3,000 components. The Composite is considered an indicator of stock performance for technology and growth U.S. and non-U.S. companies.

Quality ratings
Used to evaluate the likelihood of default by a bond issuer. Independent rating agencies analyze the financial strength of each rated issuer. Moody’s ratings range from Aaa (highest quality) to C (lowest quality). Bonds rated Baa and better are considered “investment grade.” Bonds rated Ba and below are “speculative grade” or “high yield.” Similarly, Standard & Poor’s ratings range from AAA to D. Bonds rated BBB– and better are considered “investment grade” and bonds rated BB+ and below are “speculative grade.”

Russell 1000 Index
Measures the performance of the large-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. It represents approximately 92% of the U.S. market, is a subset of the Russell 3000 Index, and includes approximately 1,000 of the largest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership.

Russell 2000 Index
Measures the performance of the small-cap segment of U.S. stocks and is a subset of the Russell 3000 Index, which encompasses the 3,000 largest U.S.-traded stocks.

Russell 3000 Index
Measures the performance of the largest 3,000 U.S. companies representing approximately 98% of the investable U.S. stock market.

Russell Midcap Index
Measures the performance of the mid-cap segment of U.S. stock and is a subset of the Russell 1000 Index. It includes approximately 800 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership.

S&P 500 Index
U.S. stock market index based on 500 large companies’ market capitalization (total value of the outstanding shares); widely regarded as the single-best gauge of large-cap U.S. stocks.

S&P Municipal Bond Index
A broad, market value-weighted index that seeks to measure the performance of the U.S. municipal bond market.

WTI, or West Texas Intermediate
A classification of sweet, light (low-density) crude oil from Texas, used as a major worldwide benchmark for oil prices.

Investments: • Are NOT FDIC-Insured. • Have NO Bank Guarantee. • May Lose Value. 
Contact an Expert