November 29, 2016— On December 4, Italian citizens will vote on constitutional reforms proposed by the government of Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. These reforms would dilute the power of the country’s Senate, making it easier for the Italian government to get laws, including structural economic reform laws, passed through the lower house Chamber of Deputies.
You may want to refer to our October 25 blog post, Italian referendum: tempest in a teapot?, which explains the issues involved with the referendum and provides our views. Since this post was published, every opinion poll (Figure 1) conducted by the seven major pollsters (five are shown below) have pointed to a “no” result by large margins, up to 10 percentage points. Given this opinion polling, we believe markets have already fully priced in the probability of a “no” outcome, including that of Prime Minister’s likely replacement by another figure in his ruling Democratic Party, Minister of Economy and Finance Pier Carlo Padoan.
Source: Strategas Research Partners
It is notable that this week’s The Economist magazine, always a bastion of market economics, supports a “no” vote. Its view is one that we identified in our October post, namely that some Italians may be voting to keep a powerful Senate as a check against the power of would-be authoritarians, such as the former prime minister Silvio Berlusconi, or perhaps Beppe Grillo, the current head of the opposition Five Star Movement. The movement was founded in 2009 on the belief that the current condition of the government is insufficient, bureaucratic, and corrupt. The group blames elites, whether they are in Rome or Brussels, for Italy’s weak economy.
We are also closely monitoring developments in France, as the major political parties prepare for a presidential election in April 2017. The principal claimants for the post are center-right Republican Francois Fillon and extreme-right National Front leader Marine Le Pen. Since the Brexit referendum, Le Pen has suggested that she would like France to reconsider its membership in the European Union. So far, the market seems to be comfortable with French political risk, but such comfort could evaporate if Le Pen leads the polls.
We maintain our benign view on the Italian referendum, which is consistent with our near-neutral tactical allocation weight to developed international equities.
Wilmington Trust is a registered service mark. Wilmington Trust Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of M&T Bank Corporation. Investment management and fiduciary services are provided by Wilmington Trust Company, operating in Delaware only, and Wilmington Trust, N.A., a national bank. Loans, retail and business deposits, and other personal and business banking services and products are offered by Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (M&T Bank), member FDIC. Wilmington Trust Investment Advisors, Inc., a subsidiary of M&T Bank, is a SEC-registered investment adviser providing investment management services to Wilmington Trust and M&T affiliates and clients.
These materials are based on public information. Facts and views presented in this report have not been reviewed by, and may not reflect information known to, professionals in other business areas of Wilmington Trust or M&T Bank who may provide or seek to provide financial services to entities referred to in this report. M&T Bank and Wilmington Trust have established information barriers between their various business groups. As a result, M&T Bank and Wilmington Trust do not disclose certain client relationships with, or compensation received from, such entities in their reports.
The information on Wilmington Wire has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. The opinions, estimates, and projections constitute the judgment of Wilmington Trust and are subject to change without notice. This commentary is for information purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the sale of any financial product or service or a recommendation or determination that any investment strategy is suitable for a specific investor. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the suitability of any investment strategy based on the investor’s objectives, financial situation, and particular needs. Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against a loss. There is no assurance that any investment strategy will succeed.
Any investment products discussed in this commentary are not insured by the FDIC or any other governmental agency, are not deposits of or other obligations of or guaranteed by M&T Bank, Wilmington Trust, or any other bank or entity, and are subject to risks, including a possible loss of the principal amount invested. Some investment products may be available only to certain “qualified investors”—that is, investors who meet certain income and/or investable assets thresholds. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or a loss.
Any positioning information provided does not include all positions that were taken in client accounts and may not be representative of current positioning. It should not be assumed that the positions described are or will be profitable or that positions taken in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of those described. Positions described are illustrative and not intended as a recommendation outside of a managed account.
Indices are not available for direct investment. Investment in a security or strategy designed to replicate the performance of an index will incur expenses, such as management fees and transaction costs that would reduce returns.
Third-party trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.